thegodx פורסם 2005 במאי 15 Share פורסם 2005 במאי 15 Gaming video cardsX850XTPEX800XTPEGeForce 6800 UX850XT (really more tied with GF6800U)GeForce BFG 6800GT OCRadeon X800 XTGeForce 6800 GTX800XL (better value than GF6800GT though)Radeon X800 PRO (whomever put this behind the GF6800 doesn't know their cards)X800/R430-12P (still not enough tests to determine it's place)GF6800GF6600GTX700Pro (X700XT MIA, but there are a bunch of X700Pro+ out there which would equal GF6600GT)X800SE Can be better and worse than the GF6600GT and X700Pro but sucks because usually far FAR more expensinve. And anyways SE = Sucky Edition.Radeon 9800 XTGF6800LEX700Radeon 9800 PRO 256( personally I prefer the R9800P-128 over this cardm cause this card's 256mb of DDRII runs too hot and doesn't OC worth a damn)Radeon 9800 PROGF6600GeForce FX 5950 UGeForce FX 5900 URadeon 9700 PRO (In Shader heavy or PS2.0 games this beats even the best FXs)Radeon 9800 (same as above)GeForce GF 5900Radeon 9700X600XTRadeon 9500 PRO (This card FAR outperforms the R9600XT in modern games and really the FX5900XTs benifits are in areaswhere all these cards get 100fps so what's +/- 5fps?X600ProGeForce FX 5900 XTRadeon 9600 XT (actually in newer DX9/PS2.0 games the R9600XT will outperform the FX5900XT [and even the FX5900 and 5900U many times]) FX5900XT is better in more olde games so gets the nod.Radeon 9600XT 256 (Who put this so high up, the 256mb version in most cases has slower memory than the 128mb version and the extra 128mb has little impact on weak [4pipe] cards)PCX5950 (Poor PCIe cousin of the other X5900 series)GeForce FX 5700 URadeon 9600 PRO Once again in newer/future games the R9600P will outperform the FX5700U. I'd say they are close to tied especially with the OCability of the R9600P.Radeon 9800 SE-256bit (Rare, but strong card, basically an R9500Pro ver.2)GeForce FX 5800 U (This card is a TERRIBLE card, not worth the money or hassle, and performance SUXOR!)GeForce FX 5800X600Radeon 9800 SE-128bit (Just below the R9600P)GeForce FX 5700 (Definitely better than the GF4tis, just turn on AA/AF to find this out). Seriously the G4ti's advanatge is in old outdated games.R9550GeForce FX 5600 U FC (See above, Rev.2 is better than the GF4tis)GF6200 (Depending on model [fulle dedicated texture memory, w/ TurboCache wo/ TC])X300PCX5750GeForce4 Ti 4600 8xGeForce4 Ti 4600GeForce4 Ti 4400GeForce4 Ti 4200 8xGeForce4 Ti 4200 128GeForce4 Ti 4200 64GeForce FX 5600 U (In newer games will be better than GF4tis, also will allow better AA/AF settings I think this is too low, but not going to defend a card even nV decided wasn't good enough)Radeon 9500 128 (Far better than given credit for, but not worth placing correctly)X300SEGeForce3 Ti 500 64Radeon 8500 64Radeon 8500 128 (Whomever made the list doesn't realize the 64mb is clocked faster, and resolutions need 128mb kill these cards anyways so little benifit from the extra 64mb)GeForce FX 5600FX5200Ultra (Far FAR Too Expensive for it's performance, but better than often thought)GMA900 (Intel's latest integrated solution isn't great but will get you better than some older cards)R8500LE/R9100R9000Pro (or rare R9200Pro)Radeon R9600SE (give boost thanks to benifits in newer games)FX5500FX5600XT/SEFX5200GeForce3 Ti 200 128 (Too old to argue placement, but shouldn't be bought for any current gaming)GeForce3 Ti 200 64 (ditto)Nothing worth Mentioning (Intel Extreme 2 would end up being wiser choice)Consider these cards if you know you will not be doing any gaming from the past year.There are exceptions, if you run at 800x600 and have everything turned all the way down, but thats below the graphics card poverty line.Radeon 9200 6Radeon 9500 64 (Still better than the FX5200/R9000/GF3ti/GF4MX)GeForce FX 5200 U (Better than this, still crap for what it's sold as, but better than bottom of original list)GeForce4 MX 460GeForce4 MX 440 8xGeForce FX 5200GeForce4 MX 440Radeon 9600 SE (Far better than this, actually useable but SE still something to avoid)Radeon 7200 32Radeon 7200 64GeForce 2 MX 400 64Radeon 7000Cards to Avoid completelyPCX 4300/5300GF4MX4000Radeon 7500XGI Volari (any of them - Huge Suckage)Xabres (Ditto)Matrox Cards (Best2D cards available, but forget doing any gaming except the fun of surround gaming which isn't a performance issue but a proprietary benifit)מקור: http://forums.livingwithstyle.com/t34001-graphics-cards:-from-best-to-worst.html קישור לתוכן שתף באתרים אחרים More sharing options...
BURTON פורסם 2005 במאי 15 Share פורסם 2005 במאי 15 מה לגביי SLI? קישור לתוכן שתף באתרים אחרים More sharing options...
thegodx פורסם 2005 במאי 15 מחבר Share פורסם 2005 במאי 15 מה לגביי SLI? NexT Week קישור לתוכן שתף באתרים אחרים More sharing options...
Yaron-Cohen פורסם 2005 במאי 15 Share פורסם 2005 במאי 15 SLI לא שווה מבחינה תקציבית...אבל מבחינת ביצועים..הוא תותח (רק בסדרת 6800)סתם אם כבר מדברים על SLI...מה עם AMR של ATI?...יש חדשות.? קישור לתוכן שתף באתרים אחרים More sharing options...
אורח ztos-- פורסם 2005 במאי 15 Share פורסם 2005 במאי 15 יפה על ההשקעה. קישור לתוכן שתף באתרים אחרים More sharing options...
Dvich פורסם 2005 במאי 16 Share פורסם 2005 במאי 16 הוא לא עשה את זה, הוא לקח ממקום אחר.ויש קצת טעויות פה ושם. קישור לתוכן שתף באתרים אחרים More sharing options...
HoT-DoG פורסם 2005 במאי 16 Share פורסם 2005 במאי 16 SLI לא שווה מבחינה תקציבית...אבל מבחינת ביצועים..הוא תותח (רק בסדרת 6800)סתם אם כבר מדברים על SLI...מה עם AMR של ATI?...יש חדשות.?מצטרף לשאלה! קישור לתוכן שתף באתרים אחרים More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
ארכיון
דיון זה הועבר לארכיון ולא ניתן להוסיף בו תגובות חדשות.